नाना आणि तनुश्री

शिवाय तक्रार केली की लगेच पुरुष आयुष्यातून उठला असं होत नाही; पण लैंगिक छळाचा मानसिक परिणाम आयुष्यभर होतो. त्यामुळे आमची सहानुभूति मीटू वाल्या बायांना. +100

संदर्भ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Me_Too_movement#Criticism १) मी टू मुव्हमेंटच्या सद्य स्थितीतील विवीध मर्यादांवर विवीध स्त्रीवाद्यांनीही तक्रार केली आहे २) सगळ्या पुरुषांविरुद्धच्या सगळ्या प्रकारच्या तक्रारींना एकाच तागडीत मोजले जात असण्या बद्दल साशंकता दिसतात. ३) The hashtag has been criticized for putting the responsibility of publicizing sexual harassment and abuse on those who experienced it, which could be re-traumatizing.[189][190][191] The hashtag has been criticized as inspiring fatigue and outrage, rather than emotionally dense communication. ४) मेट्रोपॉलीटन आहेरे स्त्री वर्गा पुरती मर्यादीत असलेली नॉन मेट्रोपॉलीटन आणि नाहीरे स्त्रीयांच्या मासेस ना अद्याप इनक्लुड न केलेली मुव्हमेंट ५) आरोपांबद्दल वस्तुनिष्ठतेच्या साशंकता आणि पुराव्या अभावी मिडिया ट्रायलने व्यक्तीचरित्रांचे पब्लिक लिंचिंग ६) Overemphasis on specific cases - हाय प्रोफाईल केसेस ना अधिक प्रसिद्धी आणि महत्व मिळते. सर्व सामान्य नियमीत समस्यांची चर्चा बाजूस पडते . वस्तुतः प्रभावी सामाजिक आणि शासकीय निती आणि नियमनासाठी सर्व सामान्य नियमीत समस्यांची चर्चा अधिक महत्वाची असावी. नाहीतर बहुसंख्य स्त्रीयांच्या समस्या बाजूस पडण्याचा धोका संभवतो. संदर्भ इंग्रजी विकिपीडिया लेख Me_Too_movement_(India)#Criticism सिमा मुस्तफा, तवलिन सिंघ, आणि गोविंद कृष्नन यांची टिका. In article "Whoa #MeToo, Hold Your Horses…" journalist Seema Mustafa expresses that while encouragement to share unexpressed feelings is a big achievement of MeToo movement, but it lacks engagement with criticism -- also from those on the same side of the fence -- which would have been helpful in strengthening the women's movement.[127] Where as journalist Tavleen Singh in her column "Fifth column: Why I am not MeToo" in Indian Express criticizes the MeToo movement participants in India as the ‘liberals’ leading the MeToo movement are too illiberal towards even smallest misgivings with their point of view[128] Govind Krishnan V in his Firstpost article "#MeToo: Accusations against men can’t be construed as guilt; calculus of probability should account for innocence" concurs with Seema Mustafa's sentiments saying one limitation of this movement is that MeToo ends up shutting out and disengaging from outside critiques which are intended to strengthen the movement.[129] Govind Krishnan V further says historically, feminism has evolved, precisely because it has shown the ability to be self-reflective. Further says that, Me Too movement needs more nuanced and richer conversations which have space for debate, disagreement and dissent. The movement needs deeper forms of engagement and a collective will to develop a self-critical discourse which can generate essential kind of intellectual spade work. [129] Journalist Seema Mustafa expresses her reservations about tone and tenor of the MeToo movement on the social media. As per Seema Mustafa's opinion it may be a generational gap, or perhaps the trial of both --- the accuser and the accused --- on the social media. This kind of media trial is too unsavory to digest. The next problem Seema Mustafa points out with MeToo movement is its inability to differentiate between the man who is guilty of rape and sexual assault from the man who solicited a woman with a drink, or an unacceptable text message. The movement offers the same ‘punishment’ for all. The same response, and the same reaction. Journalist Govind Krishnan V concurs in his article with Seema Mustafa's this argument saying, there have been too many cases where everything ranging from flirting, opening moves, clumsy passes, sleazy behavior, disrespecting boundaries, married men expressing sexual interest, all have been clumped together under sexual harassment. This remains a challenge of great importance for India’s MeToo, which it has not yet succeeded in overcoming.[129] Seema Mustafa and Tavleen Singh also feel that MeeToo movement as of now is very exclusive, elite and metropolitan in nature and hence fails represent Indian masses inclusion of whom should have been in priority list of the movement.[127][128] Seema Mustafa reminds in her criticism, that old fashioned jurisprudence does warn against collateral damage, and does speak of justice as a concept where an innocent man is not supposed to be framed, even if it means the guilty get away.[127] Seema Mustafa says while most women in Me Too movement may not be lying but still few would name a man for reasons other than harassment may leads to harassment of an innocent and that would be equally unjustifiable. Hence Seema Mustafa rebukes the Me Too movement as too subjective, arbitrary and without due responsibility. [127] Seema Mustafa also strongly criticizes on the point that, MeToo movement has a subjective mob mentality. By doing media trial this mob of Me Too movement denies accused proper chance to defend themselves. Seema Mustafa asks journalists involved in Me Too movement while enquiry and evidence are supposed to be cornerstones of journalistic values, how those basic values are missing in this movement and still on what basis these journalists can be proud of job losses of accused men without due judicial processes.[127] इंग्रजी विकिपीडिया लेख केव्हाही बदलू शकतात उत्तरदायित्वास नकार लागू

आरोप झालेल्या पुरुषांच्या रिअ‍ॅक्शनची दखल घेऊन हलकीशी चिकित्सा करणारा इप्सिता चक्रवर्ती यांचा स्क्रोलवर एक लेख आला आहे, ज्याच्या अधिक चिकित्सेस वाव असावा म्हणून इथे रुमाल टाकून ठेवतो.

वाचत आहे...

पहिले फर्स्ट पोस्टने नाव अनामिक करुन दिलेले एका जेएनयु तथाकथित चळवळ कर्त्या कन्येचे आत्मकथन आहे. ज्यात बलात्कारा विरुद्ध चळवळीचे नेतृत्व करणार्‍या व्यक्तिनेच कसा या जे एन यु कन्येवर अन्याय केला याचे वर्णन आहे. ( बहुधा काही साशंकीत सॉफ्ट कॉर्नरमुळे कन्या अधिकृत तक्रार करु इच्छित नसावी असे लेखावरुन वाटते. ड्यू प्रोसेस आणि न्यायालयासमोर जाणे टाळणे आहे त्यामुळे खरे खोटे देव जाणे ) दुसरे वृत्त टाईम्स ऑफ इंडिया : क्विन चित्रपटाचे दिग्दर्शक विकास बहल यांचा डिफामेशन सुट माननीय मुंबई उच्चन्यायालया समोर सुनावणिस आला. आरोप करणार्‍या महिलेची तक्रार विकास बहल यांच्याशी व्यावसायिक संघर्षासाठी वापरुन घेतली जात असल्याचे माननीय न्यायालयालाही जाणवले तेव्हा महिलेच्या खांद्यावरुन इतरांनी (म्हणजे व्यावसायिक संघर्षकर्त्यांनी) बंदुक चालवू नये, अशी स्पष्ट कल्पना माननीय न्यायालयाने संबंधीतांना दिल्याचे दिसते.

"No one can fire from over her shoulder. The whole movement .. The whole movement is not for that. Not for others to write what they want," said Justice SJ Kathawalla, adding, "We need guidelines in these cases, else all this will be misused and abused and we do not know where we will end up... Authorities can lay down guidelines." संदर्भ टाईम्स ऑफ इंडिया

https://www.loksatta.com/yeh-hai-mumbai-meri-jaan-news/kulwant-singh-ko… असो, ..... ....... ............. .................

संपूर्ण चर्चा वाचली चांगली चर्चा चालू आहे, सुरु ठेवा. -दिलीप बिरुटे